Law Offices - Hospice Fraud - A communicate For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms
Good evening. Yesterday, I found out about Law Offices - Hospice Fraud - A communicate For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms. Which could be very helpful in my experience and you.
Hospice Fraud - A communicate For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms
Hospice fraud in South Carolina and the United States is an expanding question as the estimate of hospice patients has exploded over the past few years. From 2004 to 2008, the estimate of patients receiving hospice care in the United States grew roughly 40% to nearly 1.5 million, and of the 2.5 million population who died in 2008, nearly one million were hospice patients. The splendid majority of population receiving hospice care receive federal benefits from the federal government through the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The condition care providers who furnish hospice services traditionally enroll in the Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to qualify to receive payments under these government programs for services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid eligible patients.
What I said. It just isn't the conclusion that the real about
Law Offices. You check this out article for information on a person want to know is
Law Offices.
Law Offices
While most hospice condition care organizations furnish suitable and ethical rehabilitation for their hospice patients, because hospice eligibility under Medicare and Medicaid involves clinical judgments which may ensue in the payments of large sums of money from the federal government, there are mammoth opportunities for fraudulent practices and false billing claims by unscrupulous hospice care providers. As new federal hospice fraud enforcement actions have demonstrated, the estimate of condition care associates and individuals who are willing to try to defraud the Medicare and Medicaid hospice benefits programs is on the rise.
A new example of hospice fraud entertaining a South Carolina hospice is Southern Care, Inc., a hospice firm that in 2009 paid .7 million to conclude an Fca case. The defendant operated hospices in 14 other states, too, together with Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. The alleged frauds were that patients were not eligible for hospice, to wit, were not terminally ill, lack of documentation of concluding illnesses, and that the firm marketed to potential patients with the promise of free medications, supplies, and the provision of home condition aides. Southern Care also entered into a 5-year Corporate Integrity trade with the Oig as part of the settlement. The qui tam relators received roughly million.
Understanding the Consequences of Hospice Fraud and Whistleblower Actions
U.S. And South Carolina consumers, together with hospice patients and their house members, and condition care employees who are employed in the hospice industry, as well as their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should wise up themselves with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and hospice fraud schemes that have advanced across the country. Consumers need to safe themselves from unethical hospice providers, and hospice employees need to guard against knowingly or unwittingly participating in condition care fraud against the federal government because they may branch themselves to menagerial sanctions, together with lengthy exclusions from working in an society which receives federal funds, mammoth civil monetary penalties and fines, and criminal sanctions, together with incarceration. When a hospice laborer discovers fraudulent escort entertaining Medicare or Medicaid billings or claims, the laborer should not participate in such behavior, and it is imperative that the unlawful escort be reported to law enforcement and/or regulatory authorities. Not only does reporting such fraudulent Medicare or Medicaid practices shield the hospice laborer from exposure to the foregoing administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, but hospice fraud whistleblowers may advantage financially under the repaymen provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on profit of the United States.
Types of Hospice Care Services
Hospice care is a type of condition care service for patients who are terminally ill. Hospices also furnish preserve services for the families of terminally ill patients. This care includes corporeal care and counseling. Hospice care is usually provided by a communal division or private firm popular ,favorite by Medicare and Medicaid. Hospice care is ready for all age groups, together with children, adults, and the elderly who are in the final stages of life. The purpose of hospice is to furnish care for the terminally ill patient and his or her house and not to cure the concluding illness.
If a patient qualifies for hospice care, the patient can receive medical and preserve services, together with nursing care, medical communal services, physician services, counseling, homemaker services, and other types of services. The hospice patient will have a team of doctors, nurses, home condition aides, communal workers, counselors and trained volunteers to help the patient and his or her house members cope with the symptoms and consequences of the concluding illness. While many hospice patients and their families can receive hospice care in the ease of their home, if the hospice patient's condition deteriorates, the patient can be transferred to a hospice facility, hospital, or nursing home to receive hospice care.
Hospice Care Statistics
The estimate of days that a patient receives hospice care is often referenced as the "length of stay" or "length of service." The length of service is dependent on a estimate of dissimilar factors, together with but not exiguous to, the type and stage of the disease, the ability of and entrance to condition care providers before the hospice referral, and the timing of the hospice referral. In 2008, the average length of stay for hospice patients was about 21 days, the average length of stay was about 69 days, roughly 35% of hospice patients died or were discharged within 7 days of the hospice referral, and only about 12% of hospice patients survived longer than 180 days.
Most hospice care patients receive hospice care in private homes (40%). Other locations where hospice services are provided are nursing homes (22%), residential facilities (6%), hospice patient facilities (21%), and acute care hospitals (10%). Hospice patients are commonly the elderly, and hospice age group percentages are 34 years or less (1%), 35 - 64 years (16%), 65 - 74 years (16%), 75 - 84 years (29%), and over 85 years (38%). As for the concluding illness resulting in a hospice referral, cancer is the diagnosis for roughly 40% of hospice patients, followed by debility unspecified (15%), heart disease (12%), dementia (11%), lung disease (8%), stroke (4%) and kidney disease (3%). Medicare pays the great majority of hospice care expenses (84%), followed by private assurance (8%), Medicaid (5%), charity care (1%) and self pay (1%).
As of 2008, there were roughly 4,700 locations which were providing hospice care in the United States, which represented about a 50% increase over ten years. There were about 3,700 associates and organizations which were providing hospice services in the United States. About half of the hospice care providers in the United States are for-profit organizations, and about half are non-profit organizations.
General summary of the Medicare and Medicaid Programs
In 1965, Congress established the Medicare agenda to furnish condition assurance for the elderly and disabled. Payments from the Medicare agenda arise from the Medicare Trust fund, which is funded by government contributions and through payroll deductions from American workers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Cms), previously known as the condition Care Financing management (Hcfa), is the federal division within the United States division of condition and Human Services (Hhs) that administers the Medicare agenda and works in partnership with state governments to administer Medicaid.
In 2007, Cms reorganized its ten geography-based field offices to a Consortia structure based on the agency's key lines of business: Medicare condition plans, Medicare financial management, Medicare fee for service operations, Medicaid and children's health, observe & certification and ability improvement. The Cms consortia consist of the following:
• Consortium for Medicare condition Plans Operations
• Consortium for Financial management and Fee for service Operations
• Consortium for Medicaid and Children's condition Operations
• Consortium for ability revision and observe & Certification Operations
Each consortium is led by a Consortium Administrator (Ca) who serves as the Cms's national focal point in the field for their firm line. Each Ca is responsible for consistent implementation of Cms programs, policy and guidance across all ten regions for matters pertaining to their firm line. In expanding to accountability for a firm line, each Ca also serves as the Agency's senior management legal for two or three Regional Offices (Ros), representing the Cms Administrator in external matters and overseeing menagerial operations.
Much of the daily management and doing of the Medicare agenda is managed through private assurance associates that ageement with the Government. These private assurance companies, sometimes called "Medicare Carriers" or "Fiscal Intermediaries," are charged with and responsible for accepting Medicare claims, determining coverage, and production payments from the Medicare Trust Fund. These carriers, together with Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators (hereinafter "Pgba"), a division of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, control pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395h and 1395u and rely on the good faith and right representations of condition care providers when processing claims.
Over the past forty years, the Medicare agenda has enabled the elderly and disabled to secure indispensable medical services from medical providers throughout the United States. indispensable to the success of the Medicare agenda is the fundamental conception that condition care providers accurately and unquestionably submit claims and bills to the Medicare Trust Fund only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, cheap and medically necessary, in full yielding with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take advantage of their elderly and disabled patients.
The Medicaid agenda is ready only to confident low-income individuals and families who must meet eligibility requirements set forth by federal and state law. Each state sets its own guidelines regarding eligibility and services. Although administered by private states, the Medicaid agenda is funded primarily by the federal government. Medicaid does not pay money to patients; rather, it sends payments directly to the patient's condition care providers. Like Medicare, the Medicaid agenda depends on condition care providers to accurately and unquestionably submit claims and bills to agenda administrators only for those medical treatments or services that are legitimate, cheap and medically necessary, in full yielding with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that medical providers not take advantage of their indigent patients.
Medicare & Medicaid Hospice Laws Which affect Sc Hospices
Hospice fraud occurs when hospice organizations, by and through their employees, agents and owners, knowingly violate the terms and conditions of the applicable Medicare and Medicaid hospice statutes, regulations, rules and conditions of participation. In order to be able to identify hospice fraud, hospices, hospice patients, hospice employees and their attorneys and lawyers must know the Medicare laws and requirements relating to hospice care benefits.
Medicare's two main sources of authorization for hospice benefits are found in the communal security Act and the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. The statutory provisions are primarily found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395d, 1395e, 1395f(a)(7), 1395x(d)(d), and 1395y, and the regulatory provisions are found at 42 C.F.R. Part 418.
To be eligible for Medicare benefits for hospice care, the patient must be eligible for Medicare Part A and be terminally ill. 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. concluding illness is established when "the private has a medical diagnosis that his or her life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(3). The patient's physician and the medical director of the hospice must certify in writing that the patient is "terminally ill." 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7); 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. After a patient's preliminary certification, Medicare provides for two ninety-day advantage periods followed by an unlimited estimate of sixty-day advantage periods. 42 U.S.C. § 1395d(a)(4). At the end of each ninety- or sixty-day period, the patient can be re-certified only if at that time he or she has less than six months to live if the illness runs its normal course. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(A). The written certification and re-certifications must be maintained in the patient's medical records. 42 C.F.R. § 418.23. A written plan of care must be established for each patient setting forth the types of hospice care services the patient is scheduled to receive, 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(B), and the hospice care has to be provided in accordance with such plan of care. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(C); 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. Clinical records for each hospice patient must be maintained by the hospice, together with plan of care, assessments, clinical notes, signed observation of election, patient responses to medication and therapy, physician certifications and re-certifications, outcome data, develop directives and physician orders. 42 C.F.R. § 418.104.
The hospice must secure a written observation of determination from the patient to elect to receive Medicare hospice benefits. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24. Importantly, once a patient has elected to receive hospice care benefits, the patient waives Medicare benefits for medical rehabilitation for the concluding disease upon which is the admitting diagnosis. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24(d).
The hospice must designate an Interdisciplinary Group (Idg) or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing concluding illness and bereavement. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. The Idg members must furnish the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. A registered nurse that is a member of the Idg must be designated to furnish coordination of care and to ensure continuous assessment of each patient's and family's needs and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The interdisciplinary group must include, but is not exiguous to, the following superior and competent professionals: (i) A physician of rehabilitation or osteopathy (who is an laborer or under ageement with the hospice); (ii) A registered nurse; (iii) A communal worker; and, (iv) A pastoral or other counselor. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56.
The Medicare hospice regulations, at 42 C.F.R. § 418.200, summarize the requirements for hospice coverage in pertinent part as follows:
To be covered, hospice services must meet the following requirements. They must be cheap and indispensable for the palliation and management of the concluding illness as well as connected conditions. The private must elect hospice care in accordance with §418.24. A plan of care must be established and periodically reviewed by the attending physician, the medical director, and the interdisciplinary group of the hospice agenda as set forth in §418.56. That plan of care must be established before hospice care is provided. The services provided must be consistent with the plan of care. A certification that the private is terminally ill must be completed as set forth in section §418.22.
The communal security Act, at 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a), limits Medicare hospice benefits, providing in pertinent part as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no cost may be made under part A or part B for any expenses incurred for items or services-... (C) in the case of hospice care, which are not cheap and indispensable for the palliation or management of concluding illness...." 42 C.F.R. § 418.50 (hospice care must be "reasonable and indispensable for the palliation and management of concluding illness"). Palliative care is defined in the regulations as "patient and family-centered care that optimizes ability of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and to facilitate patient autonomy, entrance to information, and choice." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3.
Medicare pays hospice agencies a daily rate for each day a beneficiary is enrolled in the hospice advantage and receives hospice care. The daily payments are made regardless of the estimate of services furnished on a given day and are intended to cover costs that the hospice incurs in furnishing services identified in the patient's plan of care. There are four levels of payments which are made based on the estimate of care required to meet beneficiary and house needs. 42 C.F.R. § 418.302; Cms Hospice Fact Sheet, November 2009. These four levels, and the corresponding 2010 daily rates, are as follows: habit home care (2.91); continuous home care (4.10); patient respite care (7.83); and, normal patient care (5.74).
The compound every year cap per patient in 2009 was ,014.50. This cap is carefully by adjusting the original hospice patient cap of ,500, set in 1984, by the buyer Price Index. See Cms Internet-Only by hand 100-04, part 11, section 80.2; 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i); 42 C.F.R. § 418.309. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at part 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 80.2, entitled "Cap on overall Hospice Reimbursement," provides in pertinent part as follows: "Any payments in excess of the cap must be refunded by the hospice."
Hospice patients are responsible for Medicare co-insurance payments for drugs and respite care, and the hospice may fee the patient for these co-insurance payments. However, the co-insurance payments for drugs are exiguous to the lesser of or 5% of the cost of the drugs to the hospice, and the co-insurance payments for respite care are commonly 5% of the cost made by Medicare for such services. 42 C.F.R. § 418.400.
The Medicare and Medicaid programs want institutional condition care providers, together with hospice organizations, to file an enrollment application in order to qualify to receive the programs' benefits. As part of these enrollment applications, the hospice providers certify that they will comply with Medicare and Medicaid laws, regulations, and agenda instructions, and supplementary certify that they understand that cost of a claim by Medicare and Medicaid is conditioned upon the claim and fundamental transaction complying with such agenda laws and requirements. The Medicare Enrollment Application which hospice providers must execute, Form Cms-855A, states in part as follows: "I agree to abide by the Medicare laws, regulations and agenda instructions that apply to this provider. The Medicare laws, regulations, and agenda instructions are ready through the Medicare contractor. I understand that cost of a claim by Medicare is conditioned upon the claim and the fundamental transaction complying with such laws, regulations, and agenda instructions (including, but not exiguous to, the Federal Aks and Stark laws), and on the provider's yielding with all applicable conditions of participation in Medicare."
Hospices are commonly required to bill Medicare on a monthly basis. See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at part 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 90 - Frequency of Billing. Hospices commonly file their hospice Medicare claims with their Fiscal Intermediary or Medicare Carrier pursuant to the Cms Claims by hand Form Cms 1450 (sometime also called a Form Ub-04 or Form Ub-92), either in paper or electronic form. These claim forms comprise representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of indispensable information may serve as the basis for civil monetary penalties and criminal convictions; (2) submission of the claim constitutes certification that the billing information is true, literal, and complete; (3) the submitter did not knowingly or recklessly disregard or misrepresent or conceal material facts; (4) all required physician certifications and re-certifications are on file; (5) all required patient signatures are on file; and, (6) for Medicaid purposes, the submitter understands that because cost and delight of this claim will be from Federal and State funds, any false statements, documents, or concealment of a material fact are branch to prosecution under applicable Federal or State Laws.
Hospices must also file with Cms an every year cost and data report of Medicare payments received. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(4). The every year hospice cost and data reports, Form Cms 1984-99, comprise representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of information contained in the cost report may be punishable by criminal, civil and menagerial actions, together with fines and/or imprisonment; (2) if any services identified in the report were the stock of a direct or indirect kickback or were otherwise illegal, then criminal, civil and menagerial actions may result, together with fines and/or imprisonment; (3) the report is a true, literal, and unblemished statement ready from the books and records of the victualer in accordance with applicable instructions, except as noted; and, (4) the signing officer is well-known with the laws and regulations regarding the provision of condition care services and that the services identified in this cost report were provided in yielding with such laws and regulations.
Hospice Anti-Fraud enforcement Statutes
There are a estimate of federal criminal, civil and menagerial enforcement provisions set forth in the Medicare statutes which are aimed at preventing fraudulent conduct, together with hospice fraud, and which help say agenda integrity and compliance. Some of the more important enforcement provisions of the Medicare statutes comprise the following: 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Criminal fraud and anti-kickback penalties); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-8 (Civil monetary penalties for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7 (Administrative exclusions from participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-4 (Administrative subpoena power for the Comptroller General).
Other criminal enforcement provisions which are used to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud, together with hospice fraud, comprise the following: 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (General condition care fraud criminal statute); 21 U.S.C. §§ 353, 333 (Prescription Drug Marketing Act); 18 U.S.C. § 669 (Theft or Embezzlement in association with condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (False statements relating to condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Aiding and Abetting); 18 U.S.C. § 3 (Accessory after the Fact); 18 U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of a Felony); 18 U.S.C. § 286 (Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 287 (False, Fictitious or Fraudulent Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Criminal Conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements); 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (Money Laundering); 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (Money Laundering); and, 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("Rico")).
The False Claims Act (Fca)
Hospice fraud whistleblowers may advantage financially under the repaymen provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on profit of the United States. The plaintiff in a hospice fraud whistleblower suit is also known as a relator. The most coarse Fca provisions upon which hospice fraud qui tam or whistleblower relators rely are found in 31 U.S.C. § 3729: (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for cost or approval; (B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false report or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G);..., and, (G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false report or statement material to an enforcement to pay or send money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an enforcement to pay or send money or property to the Government.... There is no requirement to prove specific intent to defraud. Rather, it is only indispensable to prove actual knowledge of the false claims, false statements, or false records, or the defendant's deliberate indifference or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b).
The Fca anti-retaliation provision protects the hospice whistleblower from retaliation from the hospice when the laborer (or a contractor) "is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment" for taking activity to try to stop the fraudulent activity. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). A hospice employee's relief includes reinstatement, 2 times the estimate of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any extra damages sustained as a ensue of the discrimination or retaliation, together with litigation costs and cheap attorneys' fees.
A Sc hospice fraud Fca whistleblower would initially file a disclosure statement, complaint and supporting documents with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Columbia, South Carolina, and the Us Attorney General. After the disclosures are filed, a federal court complaint can be filed. The Sc division where the frauds occurred, the relator's residence, and the defendant residence, will conclude which division the case will be assigned. There are eleven federal court divisions in South Carolina. Once the case has been filed, the government has 60 days to conclude either or not to intervene. During this time, federal government investigators settled in South Carolina will investigate the claims. If the case complex Medicaid, Sc Medicaid fraud unit investigators will likely come to be complex as well. If the government intervenes in the case, the U.S. Attorney for South Carolina is usually the lead attorney. If the government does not intervene, the relator's Sc attorney will prosecute the case. In South Carolina, expect a qui tam case to take one to two years to get to trial.
Tips on Recognizing Hospice Fraud Schemes
The Hhs Office of Inspector normal (Oig) has issued extra Fraud Alerts for fraudulent and abusive practices of hospices. U.S. And South Carolina hospices, patients, hospice employees and whistleblowers, their attorneys and lawyers, should be well-known with these hospice fraud practices. Tips on recognizing hospice frauds in South Carolina and the U.S. Are:
• A hospice contribution free goods or goods at below market value to induce a nursing home to refer patients to the hospice.
• False representations in a hospice's Medicare/Medicaid enrollment form.
• A hospice paying "room and board" payments to the nursing home in amounts in excess of what the nursing home would have received directly from Medicaid had the patient not been enrolled in the hospice.
• False statements in a hospice's claim form (Cms Forms 1450, Ub-04 or Ub-92).
• A hospice falsely billing for services that were not cheap or indispensable for the palliation of the symptoms of a terminally ill patient.
• A hospice paying amounts to the nursing home for "additional" services that Medicaid carefully included in its room and board cost to the hospice.
• A hospice paying above fair market value for "additional" non-core services which Medicaid does not consider to be included in its room and board payments to the nursing home.
• A hospice referring patients to a nursing home to induce the nursing home to refer its patients to the hospice.
•A hospice providing free (or below fair market value) care to nursing home patients, for whom the nursing home is receiving Medicare cost under the skilled nursing premise benefit, with the expectation that after the patient exhausts the skilled nursing premise benefit, the patient will receive hospice services from that hospice.
• A hospice providing staff at its cost to the nursing home to accomplish duties that otherwise would be performed by the nursing home.
• Incomplete or no written Plan of Care was established or reviewed at specific intervals.
• Plan of Care did not comprise an assessment of needs.
• Fraudulent statements in a hospice's cost report to the government.
• observation of determination was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• Rn supervisory visits were not made for home condition aide services.
• Certification or Re-certification of concluding illness was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• No Plan of care was included for bereavement services.
• Fraudulent billing for upcoded levels of hospice care.
• Hospice did not escort a self-assessment of ability and care provided.
• Clinical records were not maintained for every patient.
• Interdisciplinary group did not characterize and update the plan of care for each patient.
Recent Hospice Fraud enforcement Cases
The Doj and U.S. Attorney's Offices have been active in enforcing hospice fraud cases.
In 2009, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals settled an Fca lawsuit by paying .8 million to the federal government. The defendant assertedly failed to secure written certifications of concluding illness for a estimate of its patients.
In 2006, Odyssey Healthcare, a national hospice provider, paid .9 million to conclude a qui tam suit for false claims under the Fca. The hospice fraud allegations were commonly that Odyssey billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients when they were not terminally ill and ineligible for Medicare hospice benefits. A Corporate Integrity trade was also a part of the settlement. The hospice fraud qui tam relator received .3 million for blowing the whistle on the defendant.
In 2005, Faith Hospice, Inc., settled claims an Fca claim for 0,000. The hospice fraud allegations were commonly that Faith Hospice billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients more than half of whom were not terminally ill.
In 2005, Home Hospice of North Texas settled an Fca claim for 0,000 regarding allegations of fraudulently billing Medicare for ineligible hospice patients.
In 2000, Michigan osteopath Donald Dreyfuss, who pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges, together with violation of the Aks for receiving illegal kickbacks from a hospice for recommending the hospice to the staff of his nursing home, settled an Fca suit for million.
Conclusion
Hospice fraud is a growing question in South Carolina and throughout the United States. South Carolina hospice patients, hospice employees, and their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should be well-known with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and typical hospice fraud schemes. Hospice organizations should take steps to ensure full yielding with Medicare/Medicaid hospice billing requirements to avoid hospice fraud allegations and Fca litigation.
© 2010 Joseph P. Griffith, Jr.
I hope you have new knowledge about
Law Offices. Where you possibly can put to easy use in your daily life. And above all, your reaction is passed about
Law Offices.
